Blog

rjharris78

PROTECT DEMOCRACY, is a non profit pro democracy organization founded by constitutional and legal scholars and informed by some of our most learned political science experts. Following is their announcement of the release of their most recent report on the state of our Democracy, as well as a link to the entire 50 page report. The report also includes potential reforms that could improve our democratic institutions and governance. Including

  • Alternative voting methods. They specifically focus on ranked choice voting
  • Multi member districts
  • Enlarging the House of Representatives

WASHINGTON, DC — A new report released today by Protect Democracy finds that powerful but often-ignored features of our electoral system are systematically rewarding political extremism.

Despite a global surge in extremism, America’s authoritarian faction is both more extreme and more successful than similar movements in most other advanced democracies. Why?

In Advantaging Authoritarianism, Protect Democracy examines the links between escalating antidemocratic extremism and America’s single-member plurality electoral system—one “uniquely translating limited factional support into outsized political influence.” The report examines specific system features that are structurally favoring the authoritarian movement: for example, by exaggerating one party’s electoral wins, diluting minority voting power, weakening competition between the major parties, preventing an electorally viable new center-right party, and rewarding minority factions at the ballot box, among other effects.

“The U.S. is an electoral system outlier,” said Grant Tudor, report author and policy advocate with Protect Democracy. “No other democracy on earth elects its officials like we do. This report critically examines how our peculiar, outdated system is systematically advantaging America’s ascendant authoritarian faction—and how absent reform, extremism will escalate.” 

One year after the January 6th insurrection, the authoritarian movement is gaining strength, not weakening. Advantaging Authoritarianism interrogates our electoral system’s role in aggravating this extremism and how various changes could help to turn the tide.

READ THE REPORT

Submit ideas for better elections and more proportional representation

rjharris78

While we still feel like a startup working out of a garage (though it’s more like working out of a spare bedroom on zoom nowadays), we’ve decided the best way to get started is to get started.

We will start phase one by developing a format and process for submitting ideas for review. We will offer feedback and assistance in identifying areas of agreement among reformers and putting coalitions and individuals together. We’ll post our process on this site soon.

In phase one our goal is to Identify election reforms that are 1. realistic and 2. effective, with the purposeful goal to achieve proportional representation. We encourage people to think carefully about their proposal, how it would be implemented and where funding and grassroots support would come from.

We don’t know where this initiative may lead but we’re jumping right into it. See our Contact/about us page to reach us with questions, inquiries, suggestions.

PRO recommends multi winner districts with proportional voting to Portland Charter Review Commission

rjharris78

Our recommendation includes:

  • No more than three districts
  • 6-12 total City commissioners, though we recommend on the high side. If on the low side, then we recommend a single district rather than three districts.
  • Using proportional ranked choice voting method
  • Avoid primaries and elect most councilors during presidential years to increase participation

Read the entire letter and reasoning.

The basics of proportional representation

rjharris78

What characteristics do more proportional representative systems have? While PROregon doesn’t have a narrow definition of proportional representation requirements, the basic principles underlying proportional representation elections are that all voters deserve representation and that all political groups in society deserve to be represented in our legislatures in proportion to their strength in the electorate. In other words, everyone should have the right to fair representation.

Read more here

Want to give Portlanders of color a voice on City Council? Districts may not help

rjharris78

Kristin Eberhard’s article on Sightline Institute’s blog argues that Portland city Charter Commission members and advocates who care about better representation on city council—whether for Portlanders of color or for any other class of under-represented Portlanders—would do well to look to multi-winner races and proportional voting, not single-winner districts. Read more here